Saturday, 25 May 2013
  • Home
  • About
  • Blogroll
  • Contact
  • Store

Connect


Recommended Reading

  • Home
  • Categories
  • Tags
  • Search
  • Archives
Subscribe to feed Latest Entries
Donald E. Hester

To the Core

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 22 March 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

alt

Is the Christianity we have today what it was 2000 years ago? The barnacles of time have changed how we view Christianity. I have wanted to discuss this topic for some time now. I am just getting to the point where I am getting around to it.

One of the reasons people like Billy Graham so much is because the only thing he preaches is the core message of Christianity. What some call the primary issues or the essential of Christianity. Everything outside of the core is secondary, tertiary or non-essential. For me anything outside of the core is open to interpretation and the individual’s discretion.
 
"In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity.” St. Augustine
 
The core message of Christianity is basically the God of the universe, loves you and me, even though we do not deserve it, and that He provided a way for us to be reconciled to Himself. Justice and Love are God's characteristics. His justice requires payment for what we have done wrong. His love provides away for us to return to a relationship with Him. He paid for your wrongs! (Mine too) How could anyone have a problem with a God who picks up the tab?
 
Nothing in the core of Christianity is cultural. That is why it grows in very diverse cultures. However, have some people in Christianity focused more on their cultural adaptation of Christianity than the central message?
 
I think that some traditions are fine. I don't think they should become our focus. If we are focusing on them we run the risk of losing genuine Christianity. Not only that we start to fight over the non-essentials. What happens? When people think of Christians they think it is a set of rules. The rest of the world does not hear a massage of love and reconciliation.   Instead the world hears a message of hatred and division.
 
"It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery." NASB Galatians 5:1
 
I really think that God has more latitude on issues than we have. I think it is hard for people to get beyond behavior. Especially the behavior of others. I am sure Ted Haggard would like more latitude on homosexuality for his actions than he previously showed to others for their actions.
 
“For God loved the world so much that he gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. God sent his Son into the world not to judge the world, but to save the world through him. There is no judgment against anyone who believes in him. But anyone who does not believe in him has already been judged for not believing in God’s one and only Son.  And the judgment is based on this fact: God’s light came into the world, but people loved the darkness more than the light, for their actions were evil. All who do evil hate the light and refuse to go near it for fear their sins will be exposed.  But those who do what is right come to the light so others can see that they are doing what God wants.” NLT John 3:16-21
 
People do not need to clean their lives up before they come to God. In fact, they can't. I know, I have tried. Are you tired of tiring?
 
"Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in union with the Messiah Jesus." ISV Romans 8:1
 
You will be surprised at how your desires of your past live will fade once you have been renewed. If you have been to church or attend church and still feel like you are on a treadmill of continuous works, maybe the church you attended or attend is focused more on the barnacles than the core message of Christianity.
 
Let’s get back to the basics and stop focusing on the BS. Let’s focus on what really matters.
 
[I have chosen this picture because it illustrates how barnacles of time can obscure our view of the core.]
Tags: Christian Living
Hits: 1765 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Book Review: Crazy Love

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 17 March 2009
Book Reviews 0 Comments

Crazy Love bookCrazy Love, what a crazy book! The book does a great job of focusing on the important things of life. I think Christians should spend more time focused on the Love of God and not all the other crap we get tied to. Francis Chan starts the book with this question, "How many of you have read the New Testament and wondered if we in the church are missing it?" He also brings up the story that he almost joined the Marines. He would have made a great Marine. 

Some people think that Christianity is simply fight your desires in order to please God. If you think that you miss the point! God loves us and wants us to love others. If we loved God, we would not want to sin, heck the world would be like heaven.
 
 
Some of my favorite quotes for the book.
 
"God exists outside of time, and since we are within time, there is no way we will ever totally grasp that concept."
 
"...but it is ridiculous for us to think we have the right to limit God to something we are capable of comprehending."
 
"Could it be your arrogance that makes you think God owes you an explanation?"
 
"On the average day, we live caught up in ourselves."
 
"Frankly, you need to get over yourself. It might sound harsh, but that's seriously what it means."
 
"Most of us, to some degree , have a difficult time understanding, believing, or accepting God's absolute and unlimited love for us."
 
"So why does God still love us, despite us?"
 
"Are we in love with God or just His stuff?"
 
"Prosperity hardens the heart." William Wilberforce
 
"By now you've probably realized that you have a distinct choice to make: just let life happen, which is tantamount to serving God your leftovers, or actively run toward Christ."
 
"True love requires sacrifice."
 
Check out the website for the book it has some great intro videos for each of the chapters.
www.crazylovebook.com
Tags: Love, Review, Book
Hits: 3681 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Are you wearing Orange or Green?

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 17 March 2009
Religion 0 Comments

Ireland Flag

Are you wearing Orange or Green?
 
It wasn't until recently that I found out that Irish Catholics wear green on St. Patrick's day and Irish Protestants wear Orange. If you notice the Irish flag it is Green, White and Orange. I remember a Simpson's episode wear they head two parades in town, one with Orange Irish and one with Green Irish. They parades collide into a frenzy of Irish pub brawling.
 
A few years back I decided I would wear Orange as I am a Protestant. Even though, all my previous St. Patrick's days I wore Green. Now I wonder if it really makes any difference at all. I mean it is just a custom we have developed that seems harmless. However, over the years this difference between Protestants and Catholics has lead to the bloodshed of fellow Irish Christians.
 
Christians killing Christians. What must the rest of the world think?
 
I think I want to make a point from now on and pick the color between Orange and Green. I will wear White, the color of peace and purity; the color between the Irish Orange and Green. I wonder if I can get white 4 leaf clovers buttons made? How cool would it be to start a new custom that promotes peace?
 
Just in case you were wondering I have Green, White and Orange on my shirt.
 
Notice: No Leprechauns were harmed in the making of the blog! This is a green friendly blog!
Tags: Peace, Conflict, Irish, Theology
Hits: 3509 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Free from Religion

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Saturday, 14 March 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

altI was on FaceBook the other day trying to group my friends into some type of logical order. While I trying to figure out an easy way to group them, by the way the controls in FaceBook for grouping friends needs help, I can across Dave’s profile and under religious views, he has “Jesus has set me free from religion”.

I remember how much my life was changed when I realized it was about a relationship and not a bunch of rules. It is about freedom! Freedom to sin? I guess if you really want to. Do you really want to? Maybe, just maybe consider this, freedom to love! Freedom to help others, to do what is right. Freedom to live for God, to bring him the glory. Just a thought, but maybe, you can try it.
 
Legalism is a burden that we cannot bear. When we try to we end up stumbling and look like hypocrites. Not only that, have you ever noticed that legalistic people tend to focus on all the things that others are doing wrong. Why don’t they focus on their own issues? I guarantee their issues would keep them busy for the rest of their lives.
 
We know the law was sent to condemn us not to bring us salvation. We also know that the laws bread desire for what we can’t have.   Too bad Ted Haggard did not know this. Had he walked in a relationship and not focused on what he and others could not do, he would not have ended up where he did.
 
I do feel for Ted and will pray for him. I am not praying that he be delivered from his homosexual issues. I pray that he might know how far and wide and deep is the Grace of God. That he would learn to put the law down and enter into freedom.
 
I am not preaching this as someone who has perfected this. I still struggle with legalism and will until I meet my Maker. My prayer is that I will grow in desire to know Him.
 
"Through you the blind will see
Through you the mute will sing
Through you the dead will rise
Through you all hearts will praise
Through you the darkness flees
Through you my heart screams
I am free

I am free to run
I am free to dance
I AM FREE TO LIVE FOR YOU
I AM FREE

Through you the kingdom comes
Through you the battle's won
Through you the price is paid
Through you I'm not afraid
Through you there's victory
Because of you my soul sings
I am free
 
Who the Son sets free is free indeed"
- Newsboys

 

[The Pictures is of my daughter. I was practicing taking pictures of silhouettes and this picture came out. It is one of my top views on my Flickr account.]
Tags: Freedom, Legalism, Christian Living
Hits: 1761 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Missed Opportunities

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 10 March 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

alt

I wonder, how many times in my life, I have missed an opportunity to do something good. I can remember times when an opportunity has presented itself and I remember rationalizing why I should not help or get involved. I think that I have become very adept at rationalizing why I should not help or get involved. I wish God would take my excuses away. I can remember at the time thinking I should have helped. Should of… I remember it happening all too often. I think I have become too comfortable with non-involvement.

Imagine a world where people decide to help instead of passing on the opportunity. Wouldn’t the world be a better place?
 
For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do. Ephesians 2:10 NIV
 
Now think of this. What if those opportunities where set up just for you? No one else, just you. The opportunity has been divinely appointed just for you. Do you let it pass or seize the day?
Tags: Christian Living
Hits: 747 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

My Thoughts on 2 Chronicles

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Monday, 09 March 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

 alt

This is a continuation of my ongoing report. I recently decided to listen to the Bible in an effort to gain a closer relationship with God. I purposefully listen not with the intent to study. I have a hard time reading the Bible I just start looking things up and I don't make much progress. I am listening to the Bible Experience (http://www.inspiredby.com/) which is a dramatized NIV version with many famous African American leaders, singers, actors and artists. (Even Samuel L. Jackson) As I listen through the Bible, hopefully I will make it all the way through, I will post notes and thoughts I have.

Similar account to the book of Kings just with a different perspective.
 
What does it mean when it says cubit of the old standard?
Need to know the date of the book in order to understand what is meant by the Ark is still there?
 
Explains why the temple was destroyed, it was because they rejected God.
 
Not much is said about Sheba queen of Ethiopia. Nothing is said if she had a son with Solomon.
 
Solomon ruled to the Euphrates River. It did not last long after him.
 
Chapter 10 was another example of a failure to lead like a servant.
 
What is the difference between seer verses prophet? Chapter 12.
 
Arabs are mentioned the first time as I recall in Chapter 17.
 
To help date the book the phrase 'To this day Edom has been in rebellion to this day.'
 
Chapter 21 what is the disease talked about? Sounds gross.
"...severe sickness, a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out…" NASB (2 Ch 21:15)
 
Chapter 24 speaking God's truth can lead to death.
 
I like the phrase did what was right in the eyes of the Lord but not wholeheartedly. It just sounds funny.
 
Hezekiah sounds like he was a great king. Seems like greater detail as it gets deeper in the book. More on Hezekiah than other books.
 
They kept on destroying idols; they seem to crop up like weeds.
 
Woman prophet in chapter 34.
 
Who is Neco king of Egypt?
 
Ark of the Covenant update:
 
Apparently the ark, or a ark was around hidden someplace and then it was placed in the temple during King Josiah reign. This was just before Babylon invaded.
 
"He also said to the Levites who taught all Israel and who were holy to the Lord, “Put the holy ark in the house which Solomon the son of David king of Israel built; it will be a burden on your shoulders no longer. Now serve the Lord your God and His people Israel. " NASB (2 Ch 35:3)
 
When you read this, you get the idea that the Ark was hidden and then brought out. When was it hidden? Where was it hidden? During Hezekiah's reign, they found the book of Moses in the temple. Could it be that the Ark was hidden near or under the temple?
Tags: Bible, Commentary
Hits: 2671 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Marine Corps Leadership

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Friday, 06 March 2009
Leadership 0 Comments

Marine Flag and globe

The Marines have always been recognized at producing good leaders. Below are some of the things that Marines not only must know, but they must demonstrate if they want to be a leader of Marines. All of these can be applied to any leadership position, whether it be as a Fire Team Leader, Platoon Sergeant, a Battalion Commander, a Fortune-500 CEO, or parent.

 
Leadership Principles
 
  • Know yourself and seek self-improvement.
  • Be technically and tactically proficient.
  • Develop a sense of responsibility among your subordinates.
  • Make sound and timely decisions.
  • Set the example.
  • Know your Marines and look out for their welfare.
  • Keep your Marines informed.
  • Seek responsibility and take responsibility for your actions.
  • Ensure assigned tasks are understood, supervised, and accomplished.
  • Train your Marines as a team.
  • Employ your command in accordance with its capabilities.
 
Leadership Traits
 
  • Dependability - The certainty of proper performance of duty.
  • Bearing - Creating a favorable impression in carriage, appearance and personal conduct at all times.
  • Courage - The mental quality that recognizes fear of danger or criticism, but enables a man to proceed in the face of it with calmness and firmness.
  • Decisiveness - Ability to make decisions promptly and to announce them in clear, forceful manner.
  • Endurance - The mental and physical stamina measured by the ability to withstand pain, fatigue, stress and hardship.
  • Enthusiasm - The display of sincere interest and exuberance in the performance of duty.
  • Initiative - Taking action in the absence of orders.
  • Integrity - Uprightness of character and soundness of moral principles; includes the qualities of truthfulness and honesty.
  • Judgment - The ability to weigh facts and possible solutions on which to base sound decisions.
  • Justice - Giving reward and punishment according to merits of the case in question. The ability to administer a system of rewards and punishments impartially and consistently.
  • Knowledge - Understanding of a science or an art. The range of one's information, including professional knowledge and an understanding of your Marines.
  • Tact - The ability to deal with others without creating offense.
  • Unselfishness - Avoidance of providing for one's own comfort and personal advancement at the expense of others.
  • Loyalty - The quality of faithfulness to country, the Corps, the unit, to one's seniors, subordinates and peers.
 
Troop Leading Steps (BAMCIS)
 
  • Begin the planning - if you want to succeed at something you must plan
  • Arrange for reconnaissance - decide what things need to be researched to make your plan work
  • Make the reconnaissance - do the research
  • Complete the planning - make final modifications to your plan taking the information you gathered in the previous step into account
  • Issue Orders - delegate tasks and authority as needed (see SMEAC below)
  • Supervise - make sure that orders are understood and followed
 
5-Paragraph Order (SMEAC)
 
  • Situation - describe what the current situation is
  • Mission - describe what the current mission is
  • Execution - describe how the mission will be carried out
  • Administration and Logistics - describe how administrative duties and logistical support will be handled
  • Command and Signals - describe who the persons in authority are and any special signals that need to be recognized
 
Three Leadership Styles
 
  • Autocratic (Authoritarian)
  • Democratic (Persuasion)
  • Combination of both
  •  

Tags: Leadership, Marine Corps
Hits: 815 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Customer Service

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 04 March 2009
Leadership 0 Comments

forest light

One of the leadership traits that is all to often overlooked is customer service. I think it is a personal value as well, not limited just to leadership. Everyone respects and wants customer service when they are the customer. They will even complain if they service is not up to their standards, in fact you could be terminated or not retained in a job position for not having good customer service skills.

I believe we all have 'customers' in our lives. For example, when I teach, my students are my customers. When I volunteer community service, the community is my customers. At work, my clients are my customers. As a manger, my subordinates are my customers. I don't want to limit these examples to me.  Politicians have customers too, they are their constituents.
 
Customer service is about putting the customer first, meaning above oneself. Not having the motives of pride or greed. Serve them for their benefit. Doing something only for the reason of making someone else happy or filling his or her need is the highest form of service. By putting others first the rewards will follow. If you put the rewards first you will lose customers.
 
If we put the bottom-line first we miss the bigger picture. Peter Drucker once said that businesses exist to fill a need of society. He did not say that business exist to make money. Drucker points out that they make money when they meet the need of society. You have to keep the horse in front of the cart. If you think of political corruption is always about the politician not serving his or her constituents. When they sellout to the lobbyist for their own self-interest. Health care costs are another example of bad customer service.
 
For years, I have taken my dry cleaning to a local dry cleaner. Over the years, it has changed ownership 4 times. I have noticed different levels of customer service with the different owners. Two of the previous owners had little to no customer service. My shirts were returned with broken buttons and the wrong starch. The newest owner exemplifies customer service. They go above and beyond what I expect from my dry cleaner. Every time I come in the owner genuinely smiles and asks how I am. They give me coupons I did not find in the paper. They help me carry the clothes to my car. Each shirt seems like they cared for it individually. They rush the service, without charging extra. Heck they even remember that I want light starch and my name. Best of all not a single broken button.
 
They go above an beyond any of the previous owners and they have earned my loyalty.
 
"Increase your sensitivity to issues of pride. Start to be aware of the things you do as a leader in your business or in your home anytime you are more concerned about promoting yourself than others." - The Servant Leader by Ken Blanchard and Phil Hodges
 
George Washington wanted to emulate Cincinnatus, because he gave up his easy life to serve his county, and when he was done serving his county, he did not keep the power, he returned to his former life. A true leader is one who put the needs of his 'customer' first and above his interests.
 
"Omnia relinquit servare rempublicam" (He relinquished everything to serve the Republic.)
 
George Washington and Cincinnatus are great examples of customer service.
Tags: Service, Leadership
Hits: 1305 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

My Thoughts on 1 Chronicles

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Monday, 02 March 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

flameThis is a continuation of my ongoing report. I recently decided to listen to the Bible in an effort to gain a closer relationship with God. I purposefully listen not with the intent to study. I have a hard time reading the Bible I just start looking things up and I don't make much progress. I am listening to the Bible Experience (http://www.inspiredby.com/) which is a dramatized NIV version with many famous African American leaders, singers, actors and artists. (Even Samuel L. Jackson) As I listen through the Bible, hopefully I will make it all the way through, I will post notes and thoughts I have.

The book dates itself to the Babylonian captivity.   Makes me think it was someone from Judah who wrote it.
 
The book of the Kings of Judah and the book of the kings of Israel are referenced again. (First referenced in 1 and 2 Kings).
 
The book claims to be a partial genealogy that more of the genealogy is in the books of the kings of Judah and Israel. Also stated genealogy information was also kept in the local towns.
 
This book gets into King David's rule of Israel.
 
There is a story of someone who was stuck down for touching the ark. I always wondered why if he was only being helpful.
 
God blessed those to had the Ark. 
 
Some of the stories are coved in other books but from a different point of view. I wonder why?
 
God gives military advice. 
 
King David wore a linen Ephod. Why? King and priest illusion?
 
David made a new tent for the Ark, I was wondering what happened to the original tent. Well it is talked about later in 2 Chronicles.
 
Satan is mentioned, it has been a bit of time since he was last mentioned.
 
David had a great speech. He said he would not sacrifice to God something that cost him nothing. A man after Gods own heart.
 
David reorganized the Levi priests because some of the jobs were not needed since the ark was not moving around regularly.
Tags: Bible, Commentary
Hits: 876 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

My Thoughts on the Ark of the Covenant

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 01 March 2009
Christianity 1 Comment

Ark 

This is a continuation of my ongoing report. I recently decided to listen to the Bible in an effort to gain a closer relationship with God. I purposefully listen not with the intent to study. I have a hard time reading the Bible I just start looking things up and I don't make much progress. I am listening to the Bible Experience (http://www.inspiredby.com/) which is a dramatized NIV version with many famous African American leaders, singers, actors and artists. (Even Samuel L. Jackson) As I listen through the Bible, hopefully I will make it all the way through, I will post notes and thoughts I have.
 
I have set aside a post for the Ark of the Covenant. Mostly because I have always been fascinated with it; ever since I saw Indiana Jones and Raiders of the Lost Ark. Childhood dreams and wishes it was still around and that I could be the one to find it. What a pipe dream.
 
The temple dedication is the last chronological reference to the Ark of the Covenant. The contents are listed as the stones of the Covenant.
 
The next reference (familiar to anyone who has seen Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark.)
 
The next vague reference is to the raid on the temple by Pharaoh Shishak. Sheshonk I (c. 945-924 BC) may or may not be the "Shishak" of the Old Testament (I Kings 14:25-28; II Chronicles 12:2-12). A quick internet search on Google reveled two opposing ideas of who Shishak is.
 
www.specialtyinterests.net/sheshonk.html
http://www.drfalesbaa.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=25&Itemid=31
 
The account of Shishak raiding the temple does not specifically mention the ark but it says he stole all the temple treasures. If Sheshonk had taken it, he would have promoted it everywhere and we would no doubt see it written of in his tomb. Egyptians love to write of their victories especially over other gods.
 
When Titus destroyed the second temple, he advertised that he took the holy relics. You can see them to this day on the Arch of Titus. Antiochus Epiphanes stole one when he plundered the temple and a new one had to be made, which would have been the one that Titus took. The point being these were important pieces and when they were taken; it was clear and documented who did the taking.
 
Another theory I have heard was that Solomon sent the Ark to Ethiopia with his son. In fact, the Ethiopians claim to this day it is in the Chapel of the Tablet in Axum, Ethiopia.
 
"As the story goes, the Queen of Sheba, one of Ethiopia's first rulers, traveled to Jerusalem to partake of King Solomon's wisdom. On her way home, she bore the king's son, Menelik. After Menelik went to Jerusalem to visit his father, Solomon gave him a copy of the Ark and commanded that officials of his kingdom travel back to Ethiopia to settle there. But the royal entourage that was traveling to Ethiopia could not bear to be away from the Ark, so they switched the copy with the original and smuggled the real thing out of the country. Menelik learned of this only on his way home and reasoned that since the Ark's powers hadn't destroyed his entourage, it must be God's will that it remain in Ethiopia. " Pasted from <http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080705/news_1c05ark.html>
 
Other people think that it was taken before or after the Babylonia captivity.
 
Here is a clue that it may have still have been in the Temple. Sennacherib planned to take Judah and sent a letter blaspheming God. Hezekiah took the scroll to the Temple of the Lord:
 
"Hezekiah prayed before the Lord and said, “O Lord, the God of Israel, who are enthroned above the cherubim, You are the God, You alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth. You have made heaven and earth." NASB (2 Kings 19:15)
 
Are the Cherubim the ones on the ark or the ones that were part of the temple? Given the past kings desecrated the temple, to the point they did not know they had the book of Moses in the temple. All over the temple area idols were setup and priest of the other gods were setup there. Could the Ark have still been there?
 
To me it sounds like it was hidden for a reason. For what purpose I can only speculate.
Tags: Mystery, History, Archaeology, Bible, Commentary
Hits: 3498 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Is God Mean?

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Friday, 27 February 2009
Theology 0 Comments

cloud sun rays

Since the early days of Christianity, people have made a distinction between how God acts in the Old Testament verses how He acts in the New Testament. Marcion wrote his Antitheses (= contradictory statements) contrasted the Old Testament God of wrath with Jesus’ God of love and mercy. He says that the God of the New Testament and the God of the Old Testament are antithetical, that is They are in direct and unequivocal opposition.

Some people today see it as an irreconcilable difference and thus use it to question the existence of God.

How we reconcile this is important. I have a few responses as this may require a deep discussion because it does warrant more than superficial answers. I have a number of possible answers, and I would love to read others opinions.
 
Future Context Answer
The story of God commanding Israel to destroy all of the Canaanites is often cited as an example of a wrathful God, however, we have to remember the context. First, God knows the beginning from the end and knew they would not carry out his command to completely destroy them. Second, they didn’t completely destroy them. Third, because they did not completely destroy them, the Canaanites influence in their lives lead Israel to worship other gods and all sorts of other trouble. Which eventually lead to their deportment from the land.
The fact that God deported Israel is often cited as an example of God’s wrath and not of His love. However, the context again clarifies the situation. We need to remember that God made an agreement with Israel that had clear stipulations. Israel agreed to the covenant with God. God was longsuffering to implement punishment that was agreed to in the covenant. He had every right by the terms of the agreement to leave them forever. However, He never left them fully and He restored them after a period of time. He has restored them yet again even after they rejected the Messiah. I see loving kindness in the Old Testament as well.
 
Cultural and Political Context
The restrictive and seemingly extreme laws and punishments given to Israel are often cited as an example of a wrathful God. First, we need to remember this was a theocracy and not a democracy or monarchy. Second, the culture in the area allowed for slavery and death for adultery and death for a number of other offenses. The world then was patriarchal and the laws reflect that period of time. God was establishing a government in that society. His laws slaves do not mean that He would not prefer the absence of slavery.   In addition, the laws were extreme in other ways as well. God’s laws favored justice not the elite. They were far more egalitarian than surrounding peoples of that time.
 
Paul even understood that culture limits our ability to be fully egalitarian. Paul says that we are all one in Christ that slaves should obey their masters, and the masters should be good to their slaves. In one statement, he is very egalitarian and in the next, he deals with the reality of the culture. He is not saying that he condones slavery, he just accepts the culture as it is, with hopes that one day God will correct it all.
The death penalty for breaking many of the laws is also seen as the wrath of God and not His justice or as a reflection of the society.   If you live in a village in the Holy Land 4000 years ago what do you do with criminals? Most of these places did not have the means of enforcement, such as a police force, nor did they have correctional facilities. How could they afford to house criminals and how could they afford to allow them to remain in the society?
 
Illustration Answer
I have heard some people make the claim that this is illustrative of the Christian life. That if we leave a remnant of sin in our lives and fail to expel it. It will haunt us from them on. Of course, we have to be careful with such speculations however, it seems probable that God could use it as an illustration for our lives. This is similar symbolism yeast has with sin in the Old Testament.
 
God’s Justice Answer
From a different point of view, I think it could be argued that the Creator had a morally sufficient reason to request their destruction. One thing that I always found interesting was that when Abraham came to Canaan he found people who worshiped the true God, specifically Melchizedek.   Then Israel was in Egypt and when they returned the land was devoid of anyone who worshiped God. I wonder what happened to Melchizedek and followers of the true God. Pure speculation on my part but, I think the Canaanites had something to do with it.
 
I know many people have problems with some Old Testament commands that seem to be counter to a loving God. However, we must remember that He is also a just God. Justice requires payment for wrong doing. Just requires victims to be indemnified. The Canaanites where know for sacrificing children to idols and demons. Perhaps their destruction was justice for the innocent victims of these cruel people.
 
Perspective Answer
Only God knows people’s hearts and sometimes the good and innocent are taken away in death for His purpose. There is a reference in 1 Kings 14 where God took the life of a, Abijah, son of Jeroboam because he was the only good one in the family. This is an interesting twist.
“All Israel shall mourn for him and bury him, for he alone of Jeroboam’s family will come to the grave, because in him something good was found toward the Lord God of Israel in the house of Jeroboam." 1 Kings 14:13 NASB
Even with the case of Job’s children being taken, it was for God purpose. It does not matter if they were good, bad or indifferent. It was for God’s purpose they died, not even for Job’s sake. When Job asked God why, God’s answer was, who the heck are you, are you the creator? (Paraphrased a bit). Yet, the unseen purpose was for us. We are the recipients of the story and for many who have lost loved ones find comfort in the book of Job. God’s glory is show in the midst of our trails. God can see things that Job could not and Job had to trust him.
 
Nephilim Answer
Another position put forward as to the reason God wants all of the Canaanites killed is because of a genetic problem. Now this is complete speculation are the part of those who propose it, however, it is a fascinating possibility. The position is that the devil is trying to pollute the gene pool so that the savior could not be born of a man. The idea is that when the fallen angels came down and took woman and had offspring from them a hybrid was produced called the Nephilim (Gen 6). It got so bad that God had to destroy the whole world and the only pure human being Noah and family. This is what is meant by Noah being perfect in generations or lineage. (דֹּור (dôr): lineage, generation, family line). His line had not been corrupted by the fallen angels inbreeding. 
 
The report Israel’s spies gave when they first went into the land is that they saw Nephilim there.
“There also we saw the Nephilim (the sons of Anak are part of the Nephilim); and  we became like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.” – NASB Num. 13:33
Goliath was Anakim a descendant of Anak.
 
Satan knows that the savor is to come from a linage of people that would live in that land, does it not make sense to sabotage the gene pool before Israel gets there?   Satan thinks he could thwart God plan of redemption. Could God’s command to destroy the inhabitants be to cleanse the land of any hybrids be in response to Satan’s plan? Definitely, this is one of the more intriguing possibilities.
 
Personal Answer
I don’t always know why God allows bad things to happen or even how His glory will be shown by it. Recently my father-in-law passed away and I don’t know his eternal disposition. All I know is that God is loving and just and that his disposition is the right one. I can’t see it here and know, but I trust that I will some day.
 
Combined Answer
Anyone of these answers could stand own, however maybe there is multiple answers. In ancient times and even today people believe that there are multiple levels of meaning in the Bible for everything. Maybe this is true here.   After all, an all-powerful God could orchestrate it as such. It could be like apples of gold in settings of silver.
 
I will admit that there is a fair about of speculation here. However, these are rational explanations, none of which diminished my theology or that of true Christianity. I can be a pacifist and still except these answers. 
I am not saying these are the right answers. Just that they are possibilities.
Tags: Theology, Apologetics, Context, Interpretation
Hits: 3033 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

My Thoughts on 2 Kings

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 25 February 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

altThis is a continuation of my ongoing report. I recently decided to listen to the Bible in an effort to gain a closer relationship with God. I purposefully listen not with the intent to study. I have a hard time reading the Bible I just start looking things up and I don't make much progress. I am listening to the Bible Experience (http://www.inspiredby.com/) which is a dramatized NIV version with many famous African American leaders, singers, actors and artists. (Even Samuel L. Jackson) As I listen through the Bible, hopefully I will make it all the way through, I will post notes and thoughts I have.

Dating the book based on statements in the book. The book goes up until the captivity of Judah to Babylon. Ends abruptly at that point. Talks about Israel being deported by Assyria and that they were still there.
 
Military blunder, they ran out of water on a military campaign against Moab.
 
In chapter 4, a man of God tells a woman that in a year she will have a child. I got the feeling he may have been the father.
 
Later he raised the child from the dead. I wonder was he dead or in a coma?
 
Elisha feeds many like Jesus does in the New Testament.
 
Seems like there is an illusion of John the Baptist as well when he tells someone to wash in the Jordon to be cured.
 
In chapter 5 someone asks for forgiveness in bowing to other Gods for when he returns to his master he will be required too.
 
Elisha had an invisible army in Chapter 6.
 
When the city was under siege, the people started to resort to cannibalism.
 
The Bible talks about two powers the Hittite and Egypt. At one time skeptics felt the Bible was in error because there was no know record of the Hittites. We found them. Guess the skeptics were wrong.
 
Jezebel's servants tossed her out the window. Makes my point on my last post. Everyone must have hated her. I bet she was mean to her servants.
 
In chapter 11, there is a woman ruler. Another slam against feminist claims the bible is patriarchal.
 
What is an Asheroth Pole?
 
Why did people sacrifice their children? Was it used as a form of birth control? Is it a misunderstanding transmitted from ancient times where by they understood the need of a sacrifice for forgiveness? It could be a really bad game of telephone. (The game you tell a secret to one person and they pass it on, and then they pass it on, and so on until only a remnant of the original message if any at all still exists.)
 
The King of Assyria was at peace with Judah but took Israel.
 
Hezekiah made a tunnel for water in Jerusalem, we know where it is to this day.
 
Hezekiah was showing his riches to Babylonians. Big security risk, and it turned out to be true.
 
King Manassah was evil in God's sight. He setup an Asheroth pole in the Temple of the Lord.
 
Babylon then took Judah and took all the leaders and educated people out of Judah. Many were killed. Some fled to Egypt.
 
Strange reference that one of the kings of Judah was set up like a leader in Babylon, he sat at the kings table after a time in prison. I wonder if they maintained the kingship of the concurred territories as a means to control the people in those lands. While the King is with the 'Emperor' of Babylon the people in the territory had a legitimate king and Babylon had a strangle hold on them.
Tags: Commentary, Bible
Hits: 2904 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Culturally Agnostic

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 24 February 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

alt

I am learning new things every day. One truth I am learning is that we can't understand the Bible from a mono-cultural point of view. 

I have suspected for some time and now have it confirmed in a class called Perspectives, that Christianity is culturally agnostic. In other words, Christianity is not tied to a specific culture. Christianity was born out of the Judaism and it left behind the culture and blended into new cultures.
 
I know what some people are thinking. I know that some Christians have tied culture to Christianity, especial here in America. True Christianity is not tied to the American culture, the European culture or the Jewish culture for that matter. Christianity is culturally independent.
 
As Christians, we can follow a Palestinian Jew without becoming a Jewish Palestinian. We have to set aside our mono-cultural assumptions. If we do not drop our cultural baggage, we are ting the Gospel down.
 
"Christianity more than any other faith or philosophy has been able to shed the cultural clothing with which it once seemed identified and reclothed itself in a new culture." - D.T. Niles
 
Christianity when introduced into a culture will adapt into the culture, so that the World may know and God's glory is show. This reminds me of one of the Marine Corps mottos, adapt and over come.
 
How can the good news be heard in all nations when we have cultural gaps wider than the Grand Canyon?
 
To be a Christian must you accept the culture of those who brought it?
 
Paul made a great point to the Christians who were stuck on the Jewish culture. "Let’s not make it difficult for the Ethne that are coming to God" Acts 15:1-19
 
How did Paul bridge the cultural gap?
 
"To the weak I became weak, in order to win the weak. I have become all things to all people, so that I may by all means save some." Holman Christian standard version. (1 Co 9:22)
 
In Pagan Christianity by Frank Viola (http://frankviola.wordpress.com/) shows how many of the Christian customs of today have been barrowed for pagan religions. I agree, I believe this is what Paul was talking about when he said he was all things to all people. Christianity has adapted itself over the centuries to the culture of the people.  As if the Christian message has been translated culturally.
 
The lyrics from Casting Crowns song 'What the World Needs', seem very apropos:
 
What this world needs
Is not another one hit wonder with an axe to grind,
Another two bit politician peddlin` lies,
Another three ring circus society.
 
What this world needs
Is not another sign wavin` super saint that's better than you,
Another ear pleasin` candy man afraid of the truth,
Another prophet in an Armani suit.
 
What this world needs
Is a Savior who will rescue,
A Spirit who will lead,
A Father who will love them in their time of need.
 
A Savior who will rescue,
A Spirit who will lead,
A Father who will love,
That's what this world needs.
 
What this world needs
Is for us to care more about the inside than the outside.
Have we become so blind that we can't see?
God's gotta change her heart before He changes her shirt.
 
What this world needs
Is for us to stop hiding behind our relevance.
Blendin` in so well that people can't see the difference
And it's the difference that sets the world free.
 
People aren't confused by the gospel,
They're confused by us.
Jesus is the only way to God,
But we are not the only way to Jesus.
This world doesn't need
My tie, my hoodie,
My denomination, or my translation of the Bible,
They just need Jesus.
We can be passionate about what we believe,
But we can't strap ourselves to the gospels.
Because we're slowing it down
Jesus is going to save the world,
But maybe the best thing we can do
Is just get out of the way.
 
What this world needs
Is a Savior who will rescue,
A Spirit who will lead,
A Father who will love them in their time of need.
 
A Savior who will rescue,
A Spirit who will lead,
A Father who will love,
That's what this world needs.
 
Jesus is our Savior,
That's what this world needs
Father's arms around you,
That's what this world needs
That's what this world needs
 
Tags: Lyrics, Church, Culture
Hits: 3812 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

My Thoughts on 2 Samuel & 1 Kings

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Monday, 23 February 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

Bible BooksThis is a continuation of my ongoing report. I recently decided to listen to the Bible in an effort to gain a closer relationship with God. I purposefully listen not with the intent to study. I have a hard time reading the Bible I just start looking things up and I don't make much progress. I am listening to the Bible Experience (http://www.inspiredby.com/) which is a dramatized NIV version with many famous African American leaders, singers, actors and artists. (Even Samuel L. Jackson) As I listen through the Bible, hopefully I will make it all the way through, I will post notes and thoughts I have.

 
2 Samuel
 
The book of Jasher (Asher) is referenced again. If it is reference, isn't it important? Some claim it was in the Dead Sea scrolls. I need to check on that.
 
Somebody's last words were recorded, I thought it was David's but then it didn't sound like it. I must have misheard.
 
I get lost in all the names of groups of people.
 
Gad and Nathan the prophet are talked about. Gad seems to have a minor roll. Do we have more info on this person?
 
God gave David 3 options. That was nice. That he had a choice is the nice part. What the options were may not have been.
 
David saw the angel of the lord when he was taking lives? Is this figurative or literal?
 
(I lost some of my notes on 2 Samuel. If I find them, I will post them and title them 'The Lost Notes on 2 Samuel')
 
 
1 Kings
 
Solomon put to death his father’s enemies. His brother for asking for a wife. Not just for asking for a wife it was the same brother who tried to take the throne before David was dead.
 
Solomon took Pharos daughter for a wife to have peace with Egypt.
 
How old was Solomon when he took the throne? Sounds like he was young.
 
Solomon asked God for wisdom. I too ask God for wisdom, although God did not ask me in a dream.
 
Much description on the building of the temple and palace. How the wood was floated in the water to be transported to the types of tools used and weights and measurements. We even see that the know π or they just measured the circumference and diameter and could have know π.
 
Many halls were built including a Hall of Justice.
 
Cherubim were used as decorations everywhere. What do they look like? Do we have any surviving examples?
 
God's response to the temple sounded like a prophecy of its destruction. He would always be there, unless Israel worshiped other gods in which case God would leave and leave the temple in rubble.
 
1 Kings 12 was a good example of servant leadership that was missed.
 
Solomon had a navy
 
Number of other books references, the annals of King Solomon, the annals of the kings of Israel and the annals of the kings of Judah. These books sound like historical accounts and make it sound as if the books of the Bible are an account of what God was doing in the midst of the historical events. If these books are found people would no doubt see what they think is not the same story and that the Bible is more speculation on the events. I could see people coming to this conclusion but I don't think it is that way.
 
Solomon married wives that God told the Israelites not to marry because they would lead them astray. How could a man of such wisdom fall into this trap?
 
It sounds like toward the end of his life he was not walking with God.
 
There is a reference in 1 Kings 14 where God took the life of a, Abijah, son of Jeroboam because he was the only good one in the family. This is an interesting twist.
 
“All Israel shall mourn for him and bury him, for he alone of Jeroboam’s family will come to the grave, because in him something good was found toward the Lord God of Israel in the house of Jeroboam." 1 Kings 14:13 NASB
 
Male shrine prostitutes were all over the holy land. At times, they were run out. Makes me wonder about STDs back then. People must have had major issues with STDs.
 
I think that Christians often run to fast and loose in applying some of these narrative accounts to the Church. I think we have to be very careful in doing applying Old Testament stuff to the Church, even more so when it is a narrative account. It is far too easy to take a narrative account out of context.
 
The story of Elijah and the prophets of Baal is great. He even taunts them. He must have had a sense of humor. "Maybe Baal is sleeping, maybe you should shout louder." The point of this story is what Elijah did was not of his own accord it was for God glory.
 
What was the issue with Elijah going down mount Horeb? Horeb is another name for Mt. Sinai and it is about 40 days or so away from Beersheba. This would be useful in locating Mt. Sinai.
 
Jezebel is a total bitch. Sorry, I don't have another word for it. She wasn't very nice or she was mean does not cut it. I have known women like this and now I know why they call some women Jezebel.
 
I will put my comments on the Ark on a different blog post.
Tags: Bible, Commentary
Hits: 2739 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Does Size Matter?

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 22 February 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

Coors CanI will keep this short.   

Does the size of the Church matter. I know people who are very much opposed to mega-churches. Check out a recent cartoon on mega-churches. 
 
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/outofur/archives/2009/02/ur_wisdom_megac.html
 
Is the size of the church the issue? Shouldn't the issue be whether or not the Holy Spirit working there?
 
If the Holy Spirit is working in a mega-church, who are we to oppose God?
 
It seems like complaining about the color of the pews. Is that what Christianity is about? Is it about the size of your church? Small, medium, large, would you like to super size it? If God is there, isn't that enough?
Tags: Informal Fallacy, Church
Hits: 1221 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Solution for the Arab Israeli Conflict

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 22 February 2009
Current Events 0 Comments

Flag GlobeWhy can't Muslims, Jews and Christians get along? For thousands of years there has been the unresolved conflict between the Arabs and the Jews. The Arab Israeli conflict defies a simple solution. Come to think of it; it defies a complex solution. The problem seems to be the control of the holy land. Now to look at this we need to get some context.

 
The Arabs descended from Abraham through Ishmael and Esau. The Jews descended from Abraham through Jacob. Now most people are aware the Jewish and Christian holy scriptures say that God gave the land to the decedents of Israel (Jacob). However, those very same scriptures also indicate that land is set aside for the descendants of Ishmael and Esau. The way I read this, both people groups are entitled to land.
 
Why don't they get along then? There is also a prophecy that the descendants of Ishmael would be at odds with the descendants of Jacob. Wow, a prophecy in the Bible predating Islam that says there would not be peace and there isn't.
 
Whatever solution is offered needs to include a place for everyone. Everyone will need to accept that there needs to be a place for everyone.
 
How should the Arabs treat the Israelis and how should the Israelis treat the Arabs? They need to treat each other with kindness and realize God loves them both. The God of Abraham says:
 
"He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the alien, giving him food and clothing. And you are to love those who are aliens, for you yourselves were aliens in Egypt."1
 
"He shows love to the foreigners living among you and gives them food and clothing. So you, too, must show love to foreigners, for you yourselves were once foreigners in the land of Egypt. "2
 
גֵּר alien, stranger, foreigner, i.e., one who is of a different geographical or cultural group, often with less rights than the reference group.3
 
I specifically said the God of Abraham because the Jews, Christians and Muslims all call Him God. This is what He has commanded us to do. How can you claim to support the God of Abraham, by violating His commands? Is God is a man that He should change His mind?
 
People take the principle of justice of an 'eye for an eye' out of context and use it to retaliate to a point that no one knows what started it all. If we claim to faithfully follow the prophets how can we claim that God hates one or the other?
 
 
1. The Holy Bible : New International Version. electronic ed. Grand Rapids : Zondervan, 1996, c1984, S. Dt 10:17-19
2. Tyndale House Publishers: Holy Bible : New Living Translation. 2nd ed. Wheaton, Ill. : Tyndale House Publishers, 2004, S. Dt 10:18-19
3. Swanson, James: Dictionary of Biblical Languages With Semantic Domains : Hebrew (Old Testament). electronic ed. Oak Harbor : Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997, S. DBLH 1731
Tags: Peace, Middle-East, Global, Politics
Hits: 1385 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

The FDIC has you covered, right?

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 18 February 2009
Current Events 0 Comments

  Money, coins, bills

I had a few people ask me if they should take their money out of the bank for fear that if a bank collapses they would lose all their money. I was not worried because the FDIC insures our money, right? 
 
The Federal deposit insurance protects the first $100,000 of deposits that are payable in the United States in 8,451 US banks. Of those banks $13.3 trillion in deposits are insured. This is the money that we have in the banks. How much does the FDIC have to pay out if a bank fails? The FDIC has, as of 3rd quarter 2008, $38 billion to pay out.
 
When people start saying millions, billions and trillions people go glassy eyed and I don't think they have a proper perspective. Lets look at all the zeros.
 
 
$100,000.00 deposit amount individually that is insured
$13,300,000,000,000.00 total amount of all accounts insured
$38,000,000,000.00 total amount of money FDIC has to pay out
$0.76 amount you would receive per $100 deposited, if the FDIC had to pay out on all accounts
                
 
It is true that not every bank would fail at the same time or ever.  Only a percentage of them would fail, right? Who knows. The numbers tell me that if there is a run on the banks we are all screwed.
 
I hesitate to mention that the Banks have exposure in derivatives (SIV, CDOs, CLOs, CBOs, CIOs, and CDOs of CDOs) of over $700 trillion. Lets see the zeros again: $700,000,000,000,000.00. Of that how much equity to the banks have? Less than 1%. Precarious hardly describes it.
 
Will this lead to a World Bank like the Federal Reserve on a global level? Who knows.
 
Check out Michael Lewis and David Einhorn, "The end of the Financial World as we Know it," New York Times January 4, 2009 and FDIC/IRA Bank Monitor, Q1 2008
Also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateralized_loan_obligation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_Insurance_Securitization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_(finance)
Tags: Government, Financial Collapse, Politics, Economics
Hits: 2421 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

My Thoughts on 1 Samuel

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 18 February 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

  Torah Scroll

This is a continuation of my ongoing report. I recently decided to listen to the Bible in an effort to gain a closer relationship with God. I purposefully listen not with the intent to study. I have a hard time reading the Bible I just start looking things up and I don't make much progress. I am listening to the Bible Experience (http://www.inspiredby.com/) which is a dramatized NIV version with many famous African American leaders, singers, actors and artists. (Even Samuel L. Jackson) As I listen through the Bible, hopefully I will make it all the way through, I will post notes and thoughts I have.
 
1st Samuel
What does it mean when it says Samuel did not know the Word of the Lord when he was young?
 
Israel wanted a king and asked Samuel for one. He tried to talk them out of it and God said they rejected Him not Samuel. Samuel warned about following a man and not God. However, they insisted. It made me wonder how many times instead of being lead by God we turn to man to lead us. Isn't that similar to the Pope? Instead of letting God lead us we wanted a man to lead us.
 
It appears the Ark of the Covent has moved around a bit.
 
Warfare seems to be the same as it is today. Keep technology out of the hands of your enemies. The Philistines had blacksmiths but Jews were not allowed to have blacksmiths.
 
This word ephod (אֵפֹד) kept coming up David used it to ask guidance of God. I was think it was the priests outfit from Exodus. I looked it up and I was right. Doesn't it sound strange that David would call for the vestments of the priest to ask guidance of God? Could it be that it is a figure of speech for something different?
 
Many of the people asked God for a sign and He granted the signs. The point is people said if this turns out this way you want me to make this choice. Why don't we do this today?
 
God's favor left Saul after he disobeyed God. Samuel confronted Saul and told him that he had not followed what God told him to do and Saul argued that he did follow what God wanted he just had a different interpretation.
 
Glimpses of God's character in this book
God said He is not a human that He should change His mind.
God looks at a man’s heart not his/her appearance.
 
God sent an evil spirit on Saul. What type of spirit? Is this literal or figurative? Was it what we would call mental illness?
 
Why did David pick up 5 stones when he went to slay Goliath?
Can a sling kill a man? Yes it can, I saw it on the History channel.
 
Why did Saul ask who David was after he killed Goliath? He tried to put the armor on David to go fight Goliath? Was it a rhetorical question? Did Saul have mental issues? Is the story out of chronological order?
 
Saul wanted to have the Philistines kill David and offered his daughter to him if David would bring back 100 Philistines foreskins. Why foreskins? That is actually gross.
 
Jonathan is good friend with David. They were very close. Was there something more to their relationship?
 
Saul's daughter David's wife help David escape and placed an idol in the bed so they would think it was David. Is it just me that wonders why there is an idol readily available in David's house? David may have been living in the house of Saul. Still, do they just have idols lying around everywhere?
 
David made an interesting statement in chapter 21 when he says his men's bodies are holy (clean) even when their mission is not?
 
David could have killed Saul twice and did not.
 
Do we know where Samuel was buried?
 
The witch of Endor (was she an Ewok?) Did she actually summon up Samuel? How?
 
Samuel told Saul he would be with him. Where was Samuel after he died that Saul should be with him?
Tags: Commentary, Bible
Hits: 2594 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Movie Review: Religulous

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 18 February 2009
Movie Reviews 0 Comments

I recently watched Bill Maher’s movie ‘Religulous’. I was intrigued at the concept of the movie. Given it was a comedy I expected it to be completely irreverent. He has honest questions but he does not seek honest answers. He picks extreme examples and not mainstream examples. What does this movie promote:

  • Not having faith is a luxury according to Bill Maher.
  • According to Bill Maher, religion is detrimental to human society. 
  • Religion is made up to answer tough questions. 
  • He says he made fun of religious in his standup days. 
  • He grew up Catholic and his mother was Jewish.  
  • He thinks his father stopped going to Church because of catholic prohibition with birth control.
  • Brings up issues that are religion not relationship.
  • He shows extreme example of religious people whom even I have issues with. 
  • He did not interview any serious mainstream Christians.
  • He thinks it is about faith without facts. 
  • Would you expect that multiple eyewitness accounts would be different?
  • Compares Christians with extremist Muslim terrorist.
  • He admits Sodom and Gomorrah exist but that is it.
  • Exchange Ministries was an example and the pastor says no one is born s homosexual. I think everyone is born a sinner and thus has the potential to be gay.
  • He interviews people who think religion is about themselves.
  • Bill thinks anyone who thinks a miracle happen actually had something that was a coincidence.
  • He picks 3 founding fathers who were not Christians and showcases them as a reason why this nation is not founded Christian.
  • Picks on 10 commandments.
  • He thinks humanism would come to the same conclusion. See my other posts, I don’t think so.
  • He shows that Christians don’t agree on creation and evolution.
  • He interviews an amusement park actor about Christianity. (Is this a qualified opinion?)
  • Religion is a neurological disorder.
  • Religion diverts man to a destructive course.
  • Religion must die for humans to survive.
  • Religion keeps man in bondage.
  • Atheist should not be timid.
 
He had legitimate and fair questions. He did not have fair answers and he stacked the cards to show religion as an evil.

I would rate this movie 1 comedian out of 5.

Tags: Informal Fallacy, Skepticism
Hits: 769 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Abraham Lincoln, Hero or Villain?

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Monday, 16 February 2009
Government 0 Comments

President’s day is a day where we honor our Presidents. However, some people don’t like certain Presidents. Here is one of the greatest speeches given by what some say was the greatest president while other say he was the worst president.

The Gettysburg Address
 
"Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
 
"Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
 
"But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate—we cannot consecrate—we cannot hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom— and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
 
I have heard good and bad things of this President and I want to explore this issue in this post.
 
Civil War book
  
 
I listened to lectures by Professor Allen C. Guelzo titled Mr. Lincoln: The Life of Abraham Lincoln.  Dr. Allen C. Guelzo is the Henry R. Luce Professor of the Civil War Era and Director of Civil War Era Studies at Gettysburg College in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. It was a great set of lectures. Professor Guelzo definitely has a high esteem for Lincoln.
 
Lincoln has been called the “Great Emancipator” for his part in the freeing the slaves. Many people mistakenly think that was the reason for the Civil War. The Emancipation Proclamation was not given until later in the war. Critics say it was because he wanted to stop European countries from coming to the aid of the Confederacy and not out a sense of moral obligation. However, Lincoln had was against slavery from the onset and the Republican party at the time was divided into two with those opposed to slavery and those who did not want to upset the apple cart.
 
"A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free... It will become all one thing, or all the other." Lincoln in his acceptance speech as 1858 Republican nominee for U.S. Senate from Illinois
 
At that time the question before the government was do they allow new territories to become slave states or do all new territories and states be prohibited from having slaves. Apparently, many of the founding fathers including George Washington felt that slavery was on a decline and that they did not need to address the issue at the onset and birth of the nation. It was assumed that slavery would die a natural death without intervention. The concern for many republicans at the time was that if they allowed it to expand into the new territories it would not die at all.
 
I think it is safe to say that when he was elected it was expected that he would be against slavery and would stop the south from furthering the progress of slavery. That triggered the succession on the south.
 
The question then became, do they have the right to succession from the Union. Lincoln block elected officials and the Supreme Court and started a war to bring them back into the Union. The question then arises was the war legal. The answer is that it was given the outcome, the winner writes the history. Lincoln however imprisoned citizens, members of the press, and even duly elected union legislators for nothing more than expressing concern over Lincoln’s “interpretation” of the Constitution. Does that not stand against everything us, as Americans believe in? Do we not have the right to disagree with our leaders and to speak out against them as a check and balance to their power?
 
Lincoln was determined that the American experiment in democracy must not fail. He argued that if a democracy allows the minority to leave anytime they don't like what the majority is doing we would be splintered into hundreds of smaller nations. The motto, united we stand divided we fall, was a motto he agreed with wholeheartedly. I have to admit it is a convincing argument, that if democracy is our goal we should fight to preserve it. However, is democracy our goal and supreme value?
 
Lincoln did offer to reunited the union and allow the Confederate states to determine for themselves when they would discontinue slavery. He also said that he did not have malice toward any; he just wanted the union restored above all.
 
"With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan."
—Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address
 
The North won and the nation was reunited with slavery outlawed. No one can argue that the end of slavery is a good thing. The question is, were the lost lives worth the preservation of the union? If the Union is worth preserving then the question then is does the ends justify the means. We have been taught that it did. Were we taught that because the winner writes the history?
 
I have to look at it from a different point of view. Do we always have to view this in terms of the nation? Can we look at it from God's point of view? Does this further His kingdom and purpose? My freedom is something I hold dear, I would lay my life down for it, but God, and His purpose comes first.
 
Is President Lincoln a hero or villain? I don't know that he was either. What do you think?
 
Tags: Civil War, History, Politics
Hits: 5414 Continue reading →
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>
Copyright © 2012 Donald E. Hester. Website Designed By Purple Cow Websites.