Sunday, 20 May 2012
  • Home
  • About
  • Blogroll
  • Contact
  • Store

Connect


Recommended Reading

  • Home
  • Categories
  • Tags
  • Search
  • Archives
Viewing entries tagged Morality Subscribe to feed
Donald E. Hester

A Modern Retelling of John 8:1-11

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 14 February 2012
Ethics 0 Comments

USF

A Modern Retelling of John 8:1-11

This is simply a modern retelling of John 8:1-11 about the woman caught in adultery.  I think this speaks for itself.

A Man Caught in Homosexuality

Jesus returned to the City, but early the next morning he was back again at Church. A crowd soon gathered, and he sat down and taught them.  As he was speaking, the religious teachers and leaders brought a man who had been caught in the act of sodomy. They put him in front of the crowd.

“Teacher,” they said to Jesus, “this man was caught in the act of sodomy. The Bible says this sin is punishable by death. What do you say?”

They were trying to trap him into saying something they could use against him, but Jesus stooped down and wrote in the dust with his finger. They kept demanding an answer, so he stood up again and said, “All right, but let the one who has never sinned throw the first stone!” Then he stooped down again and wrote in the dust.

When the accusers heard this, they slipped away one by one, beginning with the oldest, until only Jesus was left in the middle of the crowd with the man. Then Jesus stood up again and said to the man, “Where are your accusers? Didn’t even one of them condemn you?”

“No, Lord,” he said.

And Jesus said, “Neither do I. Go and sin no more.”

Notes

Based on the New Living Translation

I should probably make a number of qualifying statements for this but I think it stands on its own.  Ten pages of footnotes would detract from the power of the simplicity.  You can bring up a number of objections to my retelling, but, I believe it is theologically sound.  I pick this particular issue out of many that I could have.  I could just as easily retell the story with any number of other sins.  The woman who had an abortion, the couple that got divorced etc…  This passage came to mind while I was reading a blog post entitled, “Is Homosexuality the Worst Sin of All?”

Tags: Contemporary, Sociology, Sexuality Studies, Morality, Ethics, Bible, Hypocrisy, Sin, GLBT
Hits: 157 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Chronicle (the Movie)

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 08 February 2012
Movie Reviews 0 Comments

Day in Seattle

Chronicle (the Movie)

I think there is much more to this movie than meets the eye.

Spoiler Alert: Don’t read if you want to see the movie.

Storyline: Three high school friends gain telekinetic powers after making an incredible discovery of a strange object in a cave. Soon, though, they find their lives spinning out of control and their bond tested as one of them embraces his darker side.

What would happen if you gave a group of teenagers extremely strong telekinetic powers?

It depends on the teenagers. In this movie you have three very different teenagers brought together by accidently gaining telekinetic powers from an unknown source. They bond together as they learn what they can do with their powers. Steve is running for class president and is the most popular kid in school. Andrew is an unpopular misfit with a dying mother and alcoholic abusive father. Matt fits in somewhere between the two.

Andrew uses his powers and accidentally hurts someone. Matthew, his cousin, says they need to come up with rules on when and how to use the powers. I can see him quoting Uncle Ben from Spiderman, “With great power comes great responsibility.” In this situation, Matt was pleading for an moral standard.

Together they continue to learn and grow their powers. However, giving people powers that are not prepared for it can be devastating. Andrew and Steve do a magic show during the schools talent show. Andrew’s reputation changes instantly; finally, he is popular. However, Teenagers’ feelings are fickle, so when Andrew pukes on a girl at the after party, the taunting becomes worse that it was before. In addition, his father becomes more abusive as he thinks his son is up to no good. Andrew starts to feel the walls closing in.

Out of anger, Andrew accidentally kills Steve, who was trying to tell him he was still his friend. He then confronts his father and beats him up for a change. This becomes the beginning of the end, as if Andrew had tasted blood for the first time.

In a key scene to the story Andrew sits in a junk yard and crushes a car with his mind. In his internal monologue Andrew uses naturalistic evolutionary bases to explain his justification for his coming actions. His first premise is the idea that an apex predator does not feel guilt in killing inferior animals. His next premise is that he is now a superior being. His conclusion is that he then should not feel guilty if he harms others.

The final straw comes when he cannot buy medicine to ease his mother’s pain. He then rationalizes robbing people. When a robbery at a gas station goes wrong and the station explodes, Andrew ends up unconscious in the hospital. His dad comes in and tells him his mother has died and blames him because he had to go look for him that night.

Andrew snaps and the mayhem begins. Matt goes to talk to him and reason with him, but he won’t listen. The talk deteriorates to an all-out brawl. They tear the city up with their fight. In the end his anger gets the best of him, and Matt has to kill him.

You can see the materialistic naturalism based morality play out with the Judeo-Christian based objective morality being contrasted as the story progresses.[1] The self-destructive materialistic naturalism played out to it’s natural conclusion. The moral of the story: with great power comes great responsibility, and if you don’t believe you have a responsibility, you will follow self-gratification to your own destruction, leaving behind untold carnage. This is a powerful story with a powerful message.

Movie Information: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1706593/

Footnote:

[1] Both materialistic naturalism and Judeo-Christian moralities are objective. I just want to point out they are both based on something rather than the relativist position where morality depends on any number of factors. Materialistic naturalism is very much like social Darwinism (social evolution). Naturalism holds that only natural laws and forces operate in the universe and not supernatural ones, i.e. God. Materialism holds that the only things that exist in the Universe are matter and energy. Morality is thus derived as a result of material interactions i.e. genetics. It follows from this that if there is no higher power, why do we have constraints on behavior? Why not live out survival of the fittest? Morality is thus objective because you are hardwired for it. Does a lion feel guilty for killing a gazelle?

On the other hand, the Judeo-Christian view is that morality comes from the Creator. Especially in Christian doctrine, every person was created in the image of God (Imago Dei) and thus has value. It follows then that killing of people is wrong because there is a command not to from God and because people are of value to God.

One could argue that the movie does not specifically show Matt’s position as Judeo-Christian. I guess that is true, it could be based on Jainism where all life and non-violence is considered sacred. Some Native American tribes would have a similar quasi-pantheistic or animistic view. In any case Matt’s view of morality is transcendent (being entirely beyond the universe) while Andrews is materialistic (being entirely in the universe).

Tags: Culture, Review, Movie, Philosophy, Materialism, Metaphysics, Naturalism, Morality, Ethics, Paranormal, Fiction, Science
Hits: 225 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Movie Review: The Boy in the Striped Pajamas

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Friday, 10 April 2009
Movie Reviews 0 Comments

This movies starts off with a very happy beginning. Back dropped in the heydays of the 1940 as seen by children. "Set during World War II, a story seen through the innocent eyes of Bruno, the eight-year-old son of the commandant at a concentration camp, whose forbidden friendship with a Jewish boy on the other side of the camp fence has startling and unexpected consequences." Pasted from <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0914798/> 

The parents tried to keep the fact that it was a concentration camp from the young boy. To me that should be an indication to the parents that what they are involved in is wrong. The children's tutor starts to indoctrinate them. When the mother asks the father about what the tutor is teaching, he says it was what all children were being taught and needed. Very dangerous to let the state determine what your children should be taught.
 
What a heavy burden for an 8 year old boy! He gets a firsthand look at the ethical issues and the hypocrisy of the Nazis. 
 
The boy meets a little Jewish boy, his age, on the other side of the fence. Toward the end he breaks in to help the Jewish boy find his father, who presumably was sent to the furnace. He gets stuck in the prison just as they take a group to the gas chamber. And Just as I thought the boy is killed in the gas chamber at the end. The father’s evil deeds turns on him.
 
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0914798/
Tags: Holocaust, Ethics, Morality, War, History
Hits: 384 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Volition

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 08 April 2009
Current Events 0 Comments

Someone on FaceBook sent me a link to this video. It compares slavery and the holocaust with abortion. I know that everyone does not think that it is fair to compare the three different events. Citing they are to vastly different. However, I think that there is room to debate the coloration. I lean more toward the idea they are fair comparisons even if the events are different given in each case the value of life was in question.

From the website:
 
Volition (n)- The act of making a choice. Sometimes the choice of inaction has consequences stronger than we could ever imagine. Throughout history, men have been faced with difficult choices in a world that makes it easy for them to conform. This film explores the hope that lies behind every decision made in the face of adversity; the hope that is buried in the heart of those that look beyond themselves and see something bigger worth fighting for.   Pasted from <http://www.thedoorpost.com/hope/film/?film=420351f1aefa2b42b1772fe9d5cc044a>
 
I would be interested in others reaction to this movie. I think we should strive toward open communication on the subject of Abortion. 
Tags: Morality, Ethics, Apologetics
Hits: 631 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Anti-semitism in Europe

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 15 February 2009
Current Events 0 Comments

Director Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League recently said of Europeans:

"Anti-Semitism remains alive and well in the minds of many Europeans. It is distressing that there seems to be no movement away from the constancy of anti-Semitic held views, with accusations about Jews of disloyalty, control and responsibility for the death of Jesus," http://www.jnewswire.com/article/2617
 
First, Christianity has been on a decline in Europe for the last 40 years.  Christians are a minority in Europe, prior to WWII Secularism was on the rise and now Islam is on the rise. If Europe is increasingly secular or Muslim why would they care if the Jews were in control and responsible for the death of Jesus? They wouldn’t be.  http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-08-10-europe-religion-cover_x.htm
 
altThe idea that Europeans are anti-Semitic because of a perception that the Jews are responsible for the death of Jesus is preposterous. It is a distraction from the real facts. The Nazis who were a secular humanist group where the ones who tried to eradicate the Jews from the world. No doubt, the real culprits would like to use Christians as a scapegoat.
 
Second, Jesus had to be crucified. For God’s greatest glory, as a means to rescue us and redeem us from the curse of our sins. God is just and required payment for my sins and he provided a way in Jesus, just as God provided a sacrifice for Abraham.   Abraham and his son Isaac were acting out a Devine foreshadowing of what was to come later in that very place.
 
If you need to blame someone, blame me. After all, my sins required propitiation. By extension, everyone is to blame in all history, because Jesus died for all our sins.
 
So-called Christians who blame the Jews for Jesus the Messiah’s death have no understand of our faith and God’s glory is hidden from them. I am not denying that people who claim to be Christians have said some stupid things. Some may have been Christians like, Martin Luther, however, they may have been right about other things but were completely wrong about the Jews.
Personally, I think God still has work for the Jews and that one day they will see God’s glory as well.
Tags: Racism, Morality, Politics
Hits: 339 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Ted Haggard and Ray Boltz Gay Christians

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 12 February 2009
Christianity 0 Comments

alt

Recently two very prominent Christians who turn out to be gay. Ted Haggard who was very outspoken against homosexuality now admits he suffers from same sex attraction (SSA). Ray Boltz a prominent Christian musician says he has always struggled with it and was tired of living a lie. It almost seems like it is epidemic within Christianity.

As an internal discussion between Christians what should we do? Should we ignore them? Should the church excommunicate them? Or maybe have a big scarlet G put on their shirts to were around town. In the past the church tied them up and set them on fire. Should we do that? The church has a reputation for shooting its' wounded. Is that what will happen to these two men? Will they be discarded like trash? That is what the rest of the world expects us to do.
 
What is really the epidemic within Christianity?
 
Christians are supposed to be known for our love for one another. So where is the love? Should we not stand beside them in their trials? If Christians are to love their enemies, how much more should we love one another? How do we glorify God by casting away His elect?
 
No wonder the rest of the world thinks Christians are crazy. Where do we go from here?
Tags: Sin, Morality, Ethics, Sexuality Studies, GLBT
Hits: 692 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Hero: Martin Luther King Jr.

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Monday, 09 February 2009
Leadership 0 Comments

altThere is a group of people that I look up to or think exemplify a certain trait that is worth of emulation. I call them heroes for the lack of a better term. As a disclaimer, I realize that no one is perfect. I may count someone as a hero who may also have negative traits. For example Noah is a great hero because he was faithful, however, he was also a drunk. 

This time I would like to bring up the Rev. Dr. Michael Martin Luther King Jr. Partially in honor of black history month and partly because he is as good as any other to start with. The traits I most admire in him and think that he exemplifies are, non-violence, love of God, integrity and perseverance. Remember the fact that he knew his life was in danger and that he might be killed for what he believed in. Yet he continued to fight the good fight knowing what did happen, might happen.
 
If you look at another civil rights leader of the time you will find Malcolm X. In comparison, well there really isn't any comparison. The difference is in the means used to attain the goal. There is no honor in become what you hate. You can't fight intolerance with intolerance. You can't fight hate with hate.
 
I once saw a show that was a mythical meeting between Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. They discussed the issue of civil rights and they both explained why they chose the path they did. It was a great show, movie or play, not sure which. I wish I knew the name of the program. It was this program where I first learned of King's arguments and how much he relied on the Love of Christ. I later than read a number of his sermons, speeches and letters. I have a great deal of respect for him, he was a man of conviction and faith. He knew the love of Christ would prevail. 
Tags: Morality, Ethics, Civil Rights
Hits: 373 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

The Good Atheist

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Monday, 09 February 2009
Ethics 0 Comments

altIn some of my previous posts on Atheist, I have explored the source of their ethics.

Atheists derive their ethics from three precepts. 1. Survival of the fittest, 2. Self-preservation and 3. Avoid unnecessary harm. My contention is that Christian ethical precepts are superior. Christian ethical precepts being 1. love God, 2. love your neighbor, 3. love your enemy and 4. love your wife.
 
From this, I received a number of comments and emails concerning 'the good Atheist'. I have been wondering where they fit in with my contention. A number of questions came to mind. Are there truly good atheists? Is it the actions or the motivations that we should be looking at? If Atheist can act good without the Christian precepts are the Christian precepts still superior?
 
I think the Bible actually speaks to the motivation. 
 
 “But to you who are willing to listen, I say, love your enemies! Do good to those who hate you. Bless those who curse you. Pray for those who hurt you. If someone slaps you on one cheek, offer the other cheek also. If someone demands your coat, offer your shirt also. Give to anyone who asks; and when things are taken away from you, don’t try to get them back. Do to others as you would like them to do to you. If you love only those who love you, why should you get credit for that? Even sinners love those who love them! And if you do good only to those who do good to you, why should you get credit? Even sinners do that much! And if you lend money only to those who can repay you, why should you get credit? Even sinners will lend to other sinners for a full return. Love your enemies! Do good to them. Lend to them without expecting to be repaid. Then your reward from heaven will be very great, and you will truly be acting as children of the Most High, for he is kind to those who are unthankful and wicked." 
- Tyndale House Publishers: Holy Bible : New Living Translation. 2nd ed. Wheaton, Ill. : Tyndale House Publishers, 2004, S. Lk 6:27-35
 
I guess an atheist could say that it is wise to love your enemy out of self-preservation. In this way, you would not have any unnecessary enemies who could possible hurt you in the future. Out of a motivation of self-preservation, you attempt to prevent future harm to yourself. However, Jesus does not seem to be talking about love your enemy with a motivation of self-preservation. Jesus is asking us to give kindness with the motivation of not expecting anything return.
 
Most people, atheist and Christian alike, know that if we are all going to live in peace we have to at least be nice to one another. Don't we, atheist and Christian alike, do the good we do for something in return? Maybe so someone will repay the kindness, or maybe someone will see us doing good and boost our ego, or perhaps out of guilty feelings.
 
I know as a Christian I fail at this all the time. Doing good to those who will most likely be a benefit to me in the future. However every once in awhile I make a difficult choice to do good with no expectations. My family and I recently had a falling out with my in-laws after my father-in-law passed away. Given what they said and did to my wife and family I have every reason to call them enemies.   I find it harder to let something go when someone hurt my family, I think we all do. I culminated in a confrontation over the phone. I was businesslike and called them on everything they had done. I could tell they were not being 100% honest. In spite of what everyone told me I should do I let it all go. We even gave them something they did not deserve nor were owed. Did we do it so that we could bring the family back together? No. I don't think it will ever be back together. Did we do it so they would leave us alone? No. Generally, if I am right about something I generally for the principle of it will dig in and not budge to my own detriment.   Why did we do it? Because God loves them too. I don't have the feeling of love for them however, I am treating them with love. Love is actions not feelings.
 
 
Are there atheist who do good? Absolutely!   Do Christians all act with the right motivation? No. Which one has the superior precepts? I guess that is up to you.
 
Passages reflecting Christian ethical precepts from above:
  • Matthew 5:44
  • Matthew 22:37-39
  • Mark 12:30-31
  • Luke 6:27
  • Luke 6:35
  • Luke 10:27
  • John 13:34-35
  • John 15:17
  • Romans 13:8-10
  • Galatians 5:14
  • Ephesians 5:25, 28, 33
  • Colossians 3:19
  • 1 Thessalonians 4:9
  • James 2:8
  • 1 Peter 1:22
  • 1 John 4:11-12, 19-21
 
Past Posts:
  1. Christian Hypocrisy http://www.unvarnishedblog.com/component/content/article/4-apologetics/49-christian-hypocrisy
  2. Question of the Week 1 http://www.unvarnishedblog.com/component/content/article/4-apologetics/44-question-of-the-week-1
  3. How would you answer Richard Dawkins II http://www.unvarnishedblog.com/component/content/article/4-apologetics/40-what-would-you-say-to-richard-dawkins-question-ii
  4. How would you answer Richard Dawkins? http://www.unvarnishedblog.com/component/content/article/4-apologetics/40-what-would-you-say-to-richard-dawkins-question-ii
Tags: Ethics, Morality, Atheism, Apologetics
Hits: 424 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Church v. Homosexuality

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 25 January 2009
Current Events 0 Comments

altThe second post in a series exploring homosexuality and Christianity.

Redmond Pastor Ken Hutcherson of Antioch Bible Church is trying to influence the rights of Microsoft to provide benefits to Gay & Lesbian employees. A group of Microsoft employees started a FaceBook group as a protest. Do they think the Microsoft, a global company, will change because of Hutcherson?
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=6621894751&ref=nf
 
In California Churches across the county supported Proposition 8 to change the constitution of California to define marriage as only between a man and a woman.
 
Across America Christians take to the street with signs, claiming homosexuals are condemned.
 
Atheists use this issue to claim Theists are wrong or at least hypocritical.
http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/01/19/why-do-christians-hate-homosexuals-but-not-shellfish-eaters/
 
These issues don't sit well with me and raise questions in my mind.
 
The first question that comes to mind is, 'What gives Christians the right to impose our morality on non-believers?' As a Christian why do I care so much, what someone does in the privacy of their own home with another consenting adult. I have heard Christian who fears that God will stop blessing America if we don't stop them. I really don't think that is a scriptural reason. I know some Christians will cite the story of Sodom and Gomorrah as a proof text. I think they forget to look at the rest of the book. In Ezekiel 16: 49-50 the reason of the destruction was given.
 
"Sodom's sins were pride, laziness, and gluttony, while the poor and needy suffered outside her door. She was proud and did loathsome things, so I wiped her out, as you have seen."
 
Starting at Genesis God spells out why he blesses. Abraham was bless so that all the families of the world would be blessed.   To me if God takes His bless away it will be because we are no longer giving to those in need and not of His mission, 'that the world may know'.
 
Another question I have is should Christians influence a secular government to impose our morality? I know the nation has to have something to which it gains its morality from. I certainly would not want the nation’s morals to come from Stalin, Hitler or Moa. Does that mean I want the morals of a nation to come from the Vatican or the Church of England? This is one of the most difficult questions and one that I don't have a satisfactory answer for.
 
As for the presumptuous and possibly blasphemous Christians who claim homosexuals are going to hell I say:
1. To the Atheist, Christians come in all flavors you can't judge all by the actions of a few. You weaken your argument when you use hasty generalizations for your claims. Even if someone is a hypocrite it does not mean or follow that their claims or premises are incorrect. The recourse of a weak argument is to sling mud.
2. To those Christians who claim homosexuals are going to hell. How dare you! There is only One who will determine who will go to Hell and who won't. There is only one Judge. Last time I check it was not you! In addition, there is only one reason why people will not go to Heaven.
 
As I recall, the people that Jesus had the harshest criticism for was not the whore or the tax collector. He saved His harshest criticism for the religious leaders who claimed to be without sin.
 
Further proof. Nowhere in the New Testament does God, Jesus, Paul or the Apostles tell Christians to tell the Greeks to stop homosexual acts. Something they all were doing at the time. To me, that speaks volumes.
 
If I am wrong, I am wrong, please correct me. I am using the brain God gave me and the Christian reaction to homosexuality seems wrong. It does not seem to represent a Just yet Forgiving God.
 
Tags: Morality, Ethics, GLBT, Politics, Sexuality Studies, Marriage
Hits: 476 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

To be or not to be? Gay is the question.

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Sunday, 18 January 2009
Current Events 0 Comments

alt

I want to take some time and explore different perspectives on homosexuality.� I have not spent any time researching homosexuality from a Biblical perspective.� The funny thing is I know Christians who have good reasons to have opposing positions.�


I think that in today’s culture it is important to have an educated opinion on a subject that is causing a great deal of separation.� Currently, I don’t have an opinion only because I have heard very convincing and contradicting opinions from many Christians.� I really don’t want to take the easy way out and just except someone else’s opinion.


As I work through this, I will end up with a series of blogs and hopefully I will receive comments that will help me explore this issue in ways I would not have conceived.

Some of the issues I think that need to be addressed are:

  • Is homosexuality a sin?
  • Can you be a Christian and a Homosexual?
  • How should Christians treat homosexuals?
  • Should Christians enforce their morals on non-Christians?
  • Gay marriage, the State’s and Church’s role in marriage.

�

Stay tuned for more posts on the subject and please let me know your opinion.� This is a very divisive topic and one where emotions tend to run wild.� My intention is to learn and reserve judgment until I feel confident I have an educated opinion.

Tags: Politics, Morality, Theology, Sin, Ethics, GLBT, Sexuality Studies
Hits: 487 Continue reading →
Donald E. Hester

Seven Pounds, a Great Day

by Donald E. Hester
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 07 January 2009
Ethics 0 Comments

altI need sleep but can't sleep because I need to write this. 

You may have heard the phrase, "Coincidence isn't a Kosher word." I believe that know more and more. You see the day I had to day goes beyond any mathematical probabilities and the entire day, almost every part of it reflects how great today was. You may be wondering if I won the lottery. Sorry, not the lottery, actually it was something far more valuable and meaningful. In order for you to understand, the gravity of how great today was I have to give you some background. I hope that you too can see just how great a day today was!
 
[If you have not seen the movie Seven Pound and want to you may not want to read this blog as it will be a spoiler for you.]
 
This morning I get up for a long commute to teach out of town. I decided to listen to a debate on my Zune (MP3 player) and I pick one that I wanted to listen too back in November. Back in November, to my great frustration I could not get the Zune software to recognize the 1st file of the 4 files of the debate. Without the first part I did not want to listen to three quarters of the debate. What's the point? I really wanted to listen to it too! I called tech support and they had no idea what the problem was and had me try stupid things I knew would not work. (IT people hate to call tech support and deal with people who know less that we do, it is extremely frustrating.) After 4 hours trying to get it installed, I gave up. I tried it again last weekend and had the same problem. As it turned out the fix was to move it to another computer and then it worked fine. How frustrating is that? This morning, I figured, it might be a great idea to listen to the debate finally and get my mind off my stress.
 
The debate was on the existence of God and it was between Phil Fernandes and Dan Barker from the freedom from religion foundation. Dan Barker is normally a good debater, however, in this debate he made some very bad arguments and he was very disingenuous when he claimed Hitler was a Christian, everyone know that is not true. It is a well know dirty little argument trick to associate you interlocutor with Hitler. One particular statement he made caught my attention. He claimed that his moral code was superior to the Judeo-Christian God's moral code. Wow, what a claim, very presumptuous and outrageously boastful. At the time, I was thinking the guy was totally full of bullshit. What was his self-proclaimed universally know moral? "Avoid any unnecessary harm." Is that all his intellect could muster? Is this the empty and hollow moral principal that fills his life? What a piece of garbage. How is the passive, 'avoid unnecessary harm' better than and active, ‘love God, love your neighbor, love your enemy and love your wife as Christ loved the Church’? There is no way that a passive approach to avoid doing harm better than give of yourself for others and actively do good by loving others. To say that inactive passive avoidance is better than active involvement is akin to committing intellectual suicide.
 
The world becomes a better place when people actively seek to benefit others at their own expense, not when people seek to avoid unnecessary harm. In fact, from Barker's moral stance, you could argue the Nazis were justified in the holocaust (He played the Nazi card and now it is on the table). I think the Nazis really did believe that the harm that they were doing was necessary. Not on the individual level but on the level of preserving or promoting what they thought was best for the human race.    You can't justify the holocaust with Christians morals of love your enemy, it is impossible.
 
After that, I got to where I was going to work and did my job. As it turned out my best friend (a new title I give out today as I have not had a 'best friend' in awhile [other than my wife].) and I were supposed to go to a class together that was cancelled. So, he suggested we go to the movies. With my son, we wanted to see Valkyrie. I checked the movies times online and proceeded to drive to the theater. On our way there, I decided to stop by a friend’s house and drop off something and when I got there, he had something for me. A mutual friend of ours (and the only other person lately I would have counted as a brother or best friend) had passed away in July and his wife had given us both a set of prints that he showed me before he passed away. I kept the emotions in and was just thankful for the gift from beyond. Words cannot describe how much they mean to me now.
 
I left got back in the car and headed for the moves. When we got there, we found out I had the wrong time. We could not see the movie we wanted to see so my best friend suggested we try the next movie to start which was Seven Pounds. I said what, the hell let’s do it.
 
The movie started 25 minutes late, which gave me and my best friend some time to talk about the debate I listened to this morning. I told him all about it. Had the movie started on time I would not have had time we would have not discussed it.
 
The movie is about a man, played by Will Smith, who lost his wife in an accident he caused which also resulted in the death of seven innocent people. His way of making amends was to find seven worthy people and donate his organs to them. In order for him to do that, he would have to sacrifice his life for them. He had survivor’s guilt and wanted to make things right in his own way. My friend and I talked after the movie how Dan Barkers approach of avoid unnecessary harm did not come close to the self-sacrifice in the movie. In fact had he followed Dan's approach he would not have done anything and bankrupt in comparison. Because of his sacrifice, seven people got a second chance. Because of God sacrifice, we all get a second chance and we know this love because He first loved us!
 
On our way back home I mentioned what a coincidence it was all this stuff coming together today as if it was divinely orcastrated message. I told my friend at that time that coincidence was not a kosher word and we continued home. I thought that it was ironic that Dan Barker said that experience is not evidence of God existence because when he was an ordained minister he thought that God talked to him to even though he now knows 100% for sure it wasn't real. I shrugged my shoulders and thought to myself maybe it could be all just a coincidence. When I got home I got out of the car, my best friend said see you later and was going to his car. I opened my trunk and pulled out my gift from beyond and just then, it all hit me. An epiphany!
 
My friend who had passed away in July once confided in me his survivors guilt form a long time ago. A heavy burden he carried for the rest of his life. He wanted to know from God why it was him who survived and not his friend who died in his arms. I told him at the time that he could not carry that burden and that he had to let it go. I told him that maybe, just maybe, the good he has done in the rest of his life was the mission God had for him and that maybe, there was a higher purpose in his survival.
 
The reason I had said that to him was because, about two years ago, he went to a local VA hospital to visit those coming back from Afghanistan and Iraq. In the poly-trauma unit he saw a young Marine officer who was just sitting there. He said to him "Semper Fi" a coming marine greeting and the young officer looked up into his eyes and said "Semper Fi" back to him. The nurses were astonished because those where the first word that he had spoken since he came back to the States. From that time my friend, no, my brother, would go to the hospital to care for wounded and raised money to help them in any way he could. We met some of Americas finest there.
 
About a year ago, we started to raise money for a special bike that was needed at the hospital for rehabilitation. They needed a three-wheel bike as many of those recovering had head injuries and had issues with balance and needed a bike they did not have to worry about balance with. Our organization started to raise the money but it was going slow. The bike was $3200. People wanted to help but not that much. We continued on. He was actively giving to those in need not satisfied with simply avoiding unnecessary harm.
 
He passed away before he completed his mission. The members of our organization, his family and many in the community donated money in his name for a three wheel bike for the poly-trauma unit. In November, we delivered the bike to the poly-trauma rehabilitation unit. We were a team and the mission had to be completed. That’s what Marines do for each other, even if one falls, we continue until the mission is complete. As it turns out, we had lost track of that young Marine officer in the time between starting the collection until after our brother passed. We found out the week before we were going to deliver the bike that the first person that was going to use it would be that very same officer that had inspired my friend to start the program in the first place. What a great completion to his mission.
 
Tonight, as I walked into the house with the prints (my gift from beyond), I realized how much the movie and all of today's events culminated into this epiphany. Though all of our pain, suffering and lose, we have a choice to give and to love. Self-sacrifice leads to fulfillment, you give and yet you get so much in return. What an empty dead place this would be if all we did was simply avoided doing unnecessary harm. How wondrous is God’s love, that while we were undeserving, He sacrificed Himself for us, in our place?
 
My friends life gave a new chance to countless wounded heroes.
Will Smith's character's life gave a second chance and new life to seven.
Jesus life gave a second chance and new life for all of us.
 
Had my Zune work as it should have in November. Had I not decided to listen to it today. Had the commute not taken so long as I would have missed listening to it all. Had our class not been cancelled. Had my new best friend decided to flake out on me, which he could have given it was late and he had a long drive home. Had we not decided to go to the movies. Had I got the time right. Had the movie not been delayed. Had I not decided to stop by and drop something off at my friends, which I wanted to blow it off until another day. Had I not picked up the gift from my friend. Had we not discussed this. All today. I might have missed this.
 
Does God talk to us? I think so. He did for me today. Call it coincidence if you want. Or you can ask Him yourself.
 
And We know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose. Romans 8:28
Tags: Review, Movie, Atheism, Morality, Ethics
Hits: 364 Continue reading →
Copyright © 2012 Donald E. Hester. Website Designed By Purple Cow Websites.