Forbidden Archeology
by Donald E. Hester
on Friday, 26 June 2009
Book Reviews
0 Comments
Donald E. Hester
Husband, father, and adventurer. A computer science instructor who dabbles in t
User is currently offline
Post from previous blog.
Forbidden Archeology
Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson
This book covered additional fossil evidence that is being suppressed because it does not conform to the established evolutionary theory. No point of view is expressed in the book, all it covers is a catalog of fossil evidence that suggests man has been here on earth in his present form (homo sapiens) far earlier than the established dates.
The book covers human fossils, tools and evidence for the use of tools in rocks that are dated in various periods.
Ample evidence for tool using humans in the tertiary period, long before any of the assumed precursors to man. These human fossils and primitive tools have been found all around the world, from California, to Europe, to Argentina. (These dates are given based upon the accepted dates for rock stratus, these date are endorsed by the USGS and confirmed by mainstream evolutionists)
Human fossil evidence, tools, and metal work (coins and metal vessels) are found in rocks dated from 230 million years (Triassic period, pre-dinosaur). One such metal vessel was found in a rock that has been confirmed to be of a pre-Cambrian.
The book also covers evidence that transitional species are not missing links and some of the hoaxes.
If I had to guess what point of view or theory they support, I would have to go with some type of planet seeding theory.
I think this is more proof for those who are critical of current radiometric dating methods. The fact they found metal work in a pre-Cambrian rock is proof they don't know how to date and there current methods are, as other propose, incorrect.
One question I had about the creationist theory is why have no human evidence has been found in the fossil record alongside with the dinosaurs. (Other than the foot prints side by side with a dinosaur in Texas) If this book is correct and evidence has been found in strata that supports the literal creationist position I can see why it would be suppressed.
